Discover an alternative to traditional banking
 

Welcome to our off-shore banking Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

(Browse for more articles)

 

Ifs and VATs of Taxation in Macedonia - Should VAT be Applied in Macedonia?

To be justified, taxes should satisfy a regressivity.On the face of it - and for
few conditions:Above all, they should a very long time - VAT served as a prime
encourage economic activity by providing example of regressive, unfair
incentives to save and to invest. Savings taxation.For a very long time, that is
- transformed into investments- enhance until the development and propagation of
productivity and growth of the economy as the Life Cycle Theories. The main idea in
a whole.A tax should be simple - to all these theories was that consumption
administer and to comply with. It should was not based on annual, current income
be "fair" (progressive, in professional only. Rather, it took into consideration
lingo) - although no one seems to agree future flows of income (income
on what this means.At best, it should expectations). People tended to be
replace other taxes, whose compliance constant in their level of spending (in
with the above conditions is less different periods in their lives) - even
rigorous. In this case it will, usually, as their annual income vacillated. With
lead to budget cuts and reduce the the exception of millionaires and
overall tax burden.The most well known billionaires, people spent most of their
tax is the income tax. However, it fails income in their lifetime.VAT was,
to satisfy even one of the conditions therefore, a just and equal tax. If
above listed.To start with, it is income equalled consumption in the long
staggeringly complicated. The IRS code in run, VAT was a form of income tax, levied
the USA sprawls over more than 8,000 incrementally, with every purchase. It
pages and 500 forms. This single feature reflected a taxpayer's ability to pay
makes it expensive to enforce.Estimates (=to consume). It was a wealth tax. As
are that 100 billion USD are spent such, it necessitated the reduction in
annually (by both government and other taxes. Taxing money spent on
taxpayers) to comply with the tax, to consumption was taxing money already
administer it and to enforce it.Income taxed once (as income). This was classic
tax is all for consumption and against double taxation - a situation which had
savings: it taxes income spent on to be remedied.But, in any case, VAT was
consumption only once - but does so twice a proportional tax when related to a
with income earmarked for savings (by lifetime's income - rather than a
taxing the interest on it).Income taxes regressive tax when compared to annual
discriminate against business expenses income. Because consumption was a
related to the acquisition of capital parameter more stable than income - VAT
assets. These cannot be deducted that made for a more stable and predictable
same fiscal year. Rather, they have to be tax.Still, old convictions die hard. To
depreciated over an "accounting life" appease social lobbies everywhere,
which is supposed to reflect the useful politicians came up with solutions which
life of the asset. This is not the case were unanimously rejected by
with almost all other business expenses economists.The most prevalent was
(labour, to name the biggest) which are exempting a basket of "poor people's
deductible in full the same fiscal year goods" from VAT.This gave rise to a
expended in.Income taxes encourage debt series of intricate questions:If food,
financing over equity financing. After for instance, was exempted (and it always
all, retained earnings are taxed - while is) - was this not a subsidy given to
interest expenses are deductible.We can rich people as well? Don't rich people
safely say that income taxes in their eat?Moreover, who will decide what is or
current form were somewhat responsible to isn't food? Is caviar food? What about
an increase in consumer credits and in health food? It was obviously going to be
the national debt (as manifested in the very hard to reach social consensus.If
budget deficits). They also had a hand in tax on these products were zeroed - taxes
the freefall in the saving rate in the on other products would have had to go up
USA (from 3.6% in the 80s to 2.1% in the to maintain the same revenue. And so they
90s). And money evading the tax did. In most countries VAT is levied on
authorities globalised itself using means less than 45% of the GDP - and is
as diverse as off-shore banking and reckoned to be twice as high as it should
computer networking. This made taxing be.Some sought to correct this situation
sophisticated, big money close to by subjecting services to VAT but this
impossible.No wonder that taxes levied on proved onerous and impossible to
consumption rather than on income came to implement in certain sectors of the
be regarded as an interesting economy (banking and insurance, to name
alternative.Consumption taxes are levied two).Others suggested to dedicate VAT
at the Point of Sale (POS). They are a generated revenues to progressivity
mixed lot:We all get in touch with Excise enhancing programs. But this would have
Taxes. These are imposed on products entailed the imposition of additional
which are considered to be bad both for taxes to cover the shortfall.It is
the consumer and for society. These universally thought, that the best method
products bring about negative to "compensate" the poor for their
externalities: smoke and lung cancer, in regressive plight is to directly transfer
the case of tobacco, for instance. So, money to them from the budget or to give
when tobacco or alcohol are thus taxed - them vouchers (or tax credits) which they
the idea is to modify and reform our can use to get discounts in education,
behaviour which is deemed to be damaging medical treatment, etc. These measures
to society as a whole. About 7% of tax will, at least, not distort economic
revenues in the USA come from this source decisions. And we, the less lucky
- and double that in other taxpayers, will know how much we are
countries.Sales taxes have a more modest paying for - and to whom.This is one of
calling: to raise revenues by taxing the the budgetary items which increase with
finished product in the retail level. the introduction of VAT. Research shows
Unfortunately, so many authorities have that there is a strong correlation
the right to impose them - that they vary between the introduction of VAT and
greatly from one location to another. growth in government spending.
This adds to the confusion of the Admittedly, it is difficult to tell which
taxpayer (and of the retailer) and makes led to what. Still, certain groups in the
the tax more expensive to collect than it population feel that it is their natural
should have been.Moreover, it distorts right to be compensated for every income
business decisions: businesses would tend reducing measure - by virtue of the fact
to locate in places with lower sales that they don't have enough of it.But VAT
taxes.Sales taxes have a malignant effect is known to have some socially desirable
on the pricing of finished goods. First, results, as well.To start with, VAT is a
no tax credit is allowed (sales taxes renowned fighter of the Black Economy.
paid on inputs cannot be deducted from This illegitimate branch of economic
the sales tax payable by the retailer). activity consists of three elements:The
Secondly, the tax tends to cascade, non official sales of legal goods
increase the prices of goods (taxable and (produced within the tax system)The sales
not, alike), affect investments in of illegal goods (which never were within
capital goods (which are not exempt). It the tax system)The consumption of money
adversely affects exports and domestic not declared or disclosed to the tax
goods which compete with imports.In authorities VAT lays its heavy paws on
short: sales taxes tend to impede growth all three activities.VAT is self
and prevent the optimization of economic enforced. As we said, VAT offers a
resources. Compare this with the VAT powerful (money) incentive not to
(Value Added Taxes): simple, cheap to collaborate in tax scams. Every tax
collect, contain no implicit taxes on receipt means money begotten from the tax
inputs. VAT renders the pricing structure authorities.VAT is incremental. To
of goods transparent. This transparency completely evade paying VAT on a product
encourages economic efficiency.VAT is would require the collaboration of dozens
used in 80 countries worldwide and in 22 of businesses, suppliers and
out of 24 OECD countries, with the manufacturers. It is much more plausible
exception of the federal ones: the USA to cheat the income tax authorities. VAT
and Australia.There are three types of is levied on each and every phase of the
VAT. They are very different from each production cycle - it is possible to
other and the only thing common to them avoid it in some of these phases, but
all is the tax base: the value added by never in all of them. VAT is an
the taxpayer.Economic theory defines all-pervasive tax.VAT is levied on
Value Added as the sum of all the wages, consumption. It is indifferent to the
interest paid on capital, rents paid on source of the money used to pay for it.
property and profits. In the Addition VAT Thus, it is as easily applied to "black",
method, these four components are taxed undeclared, money - as it is to
directly. The State of Michigan in the completely legal funds.Surely, there are
USA uses this method since 1976. incentives to avoid and to evade it. If
Experience shows that this method yields the amount of inputs in a product is very
more predictable tax revenues and is less low, the VAT on the sale will be very
susceptible to business or industry burdensome. A business non-registered
cycles.The Subtraction method, employed with the VAT authorities will have a
in Japan and a few much smaller sizeable price advantage over his
countries, is admittedly the simplest. It registered competitor.With a differential
taxes the difference between a taxpayer's VAT system, it is easy to declare the
sales and its taxed inputs. However, it false sale of zero-rated goods or
becomes very complicated when the country services to linked entities or to falsify
has a few VAT rates, because the inputs the inputs, or both. Even computers
have to be separated according to the (which compare the ratio of sales to
various rates.Thus, the most widely inputs) cannot detect anything suspicious
accepted system is the Credit Invoice. in such a scheme.Yet, these are rare
Businesses become unpaid tax collectors. occurrences, easily detectable by cross
They are responsible to get tax receipts examining information derived from
from their suppliers (inputs). They will several databases. All in all, VAT is the
be credited with the VAT amounts on the ultimate, inevitable tax.Moreover, it is
receipts that they have collected, so virtuous. By making consumption more
they have a major incentive to do so. expensive, it would tend to divert
They will periodically pay the tax capital into investments and savings. At
authorities the difference between the least, this is what our intuition tells
VAT on their sales and the VAT on their us.Research begs to differ. It
inputs, as evidenced by the receipts that demonstrates the resilience of consumers,
they have collected. If the difference is who maintain their consumption levels in
negative - they will receive a rebate (in the face of mounting price pressures.
certain countries, directly to their bank They even reduce savings to do so. We say
account).This is a breathtakingly simple that their consumption is rigid,
concept of tax collection, which also inelastic. Also, people do not save
distributes the costs of administering because it "pays better" to save than to
the tax amongst millions of businesses. consume. They don't save because the
In the fiscal year (FY) 1977/8 in the UK relative return on savings is higher on
- the tax productivity (cost per 1 dollar savings than on consumption. They save
collected) was 2%. This means that the because they are goal oriented. They want
government paid 2 cents to collect 1 to buy something: a car, a house, higher
dollar. But businesses paid the remaining education for their children.When the
10 cents.If introduced in the USA, VAT yield increases - they will need to save
will cost only 3 billion USD (with 30,000 less money to get to the same target in
tax officials employed in a separate the prescribed period of time. We could
administration). To collect 1 dollar of say that, to some extent, savings display
income tax costs 0.56% in the USA. But, negative elasticity.Markets balance
to collect VAT in Norway costs 0.32%, in themselves through a series of intricate
Belgium - 1.09% and, on average, 0.68%. feedback loops and "true models" of
In short, VAT does not cost much more economic activity. Take an increase in
than income taxes to collect.Yet, what is savings generated by the introduction of
true for government is not necessarily so VAT: it is bound to be short lived. Why?
for their subjects.The compliance cost because the equilibrium will be
for a business in the USA is $49. It is restored.Increased savings will increase
$53-282 in other countries.Small the amount of capital available and
businesses suffer disproportionately more reduce the yields on this capital. A
than their bigger brethren. It cost them reduction in yield would, in turn, reduce
1.94% of VAT revenue in FY 1986/7 in the the savings rate.Moreover, narrow
UK. Rather more than big firms (differentiated, non-ideal) based VATs
(0.003%!).Compliance costs are 40 times lead to higher rates of VAT (to generate
higher for small businesses, on average. the same revenue). This reduces the
This figure masks a larger difference in incentives to work and the amount of
retail and basic industries (80 times income available for savings.In a very
more), in wholesale (60 times more) and thorough research, Ken Militzer found no
in manufacturing and utilities (45 times connection between the introduction of
more).It was inevitable to think about VAT and an increase in the rate of saving
exempting small business from paying in 22 OECD countries since 1965 (VAT was
VAT.If 16 out of 24 million businesses first introduced in France in 1954). He
were exempted - the costs of collecting also found no connection between VAT and
VAT will go down by 33% - while the changes in corporate (profit) and income
revenues will decline by only 3%. KPMG taxes.In Europe VAT replaced various
claims that businesses with less than turnover taxes so its impact on anything
$50,000 annual turnover (18 out of 24 was fairly insignificant. It had no
million) exempted in the USA, revenues influence on inflation, as well. VAT
would have declined by 1.5%. About 70% of apparently has two conflicting
the tax are paid by 10% of the businesses influences: it raises the general price
in the UK. For 69% of the businesses level through a one time "price shock",
there (with turnover of less than 100,000 on one hand. On the other hand, it
USD annually) the costs of collection contracts the economy by providing a
exceed 60% of the revenues. For 96% of disincentive to consume. If VAT does
the businesses (with less than 1 million influence inflation - its impact will be
USD a year) - the costs exceed 50%. Only echoed and amplified through wage
in the case of 30,000 companies - are the indexation and the linking of transfer
costs less than 20%. These figures do not payments to the Consumer Price Index
include compliance costs (=costs borne by (CPI). In this case, maybe its effects
businesses which comply with the tax should be sterilized from the
law).No wonder that small businesses calculations of the CPI.But research was
borrow money to pay that VAT bills. Many able to demonstrate only the potentially
of them - though exempt - register dangerous contracting, deflationary
voluntarily, to get an endless stream of (stagflationary, to be exact) influences
rebates. This is a major handicap for the of this tax. The recommendation is
tax system and reduces its productivity surprising: the Central Bank is advised
considerably. In a desperate effort to to increase the money supply to
cope with this law-abiding flood, tax accommodate the reverberations of the
authorities have resorted to longer introduction of this tax.Finally, VAT is
periods of reporting (instead of a "border adjustment" tax (under the GATT
monthly). Some of them (in the UK, for and WTO charters).This means that VAT is
one) allow annual VAT reports.Part of the rebated to the exporter and imposed on
problem is political. There is little the importer.Prima facie, this should
disagreement between economists that VAT encourage exports - and equally
is a tax preferable to income taxes. But discourage imports.Surprisingly, this
this statement comes with caveats: the time the intuition is right - albeit for
tax must have one rate, universally a limited period of time.Despite a raging
applied, without sector exemptions. This debate in economic literature, it seems
is the ideal VAT.The world being less safe to say the following:VAT increases
than ideal - and populated by politicians the profits of exporters and producers of
- VATs do not come this way. They contain import substitutes.VAT increases the
many rates and exemptions for categories investments in the trade sector.VAT
of goods and services.This mutilated increases exports and decreases
version is called the differentiated imports.These advantages are, ultimately,
VAT.An ideal VAT is economically neutral partially offset by the movement of
- though not equitable. This means that exchange rates.If certain sectors are not
the tax does not affect economic taxed - investment will flow to that
decisions in ways that it shouldn't. On sector and badly affect the trade sector
the other hand, its burden is not equally and the competitiveness of the country in
distributed between the haves and have world markets.With its burgeoning black
nots.VAT taxes value added in each stage market, under-developed export
of the production process. It does so by industries, huge shortfall in tax
levying a tax on goods and services - but revenues - Macedonia urgently needs
what is really taxed are the means of VAT.It will do well to learn from the
production, labour and capital. experience of others and introduce a VAT
Ultimately, shareholders of the taxpaying which is as ideal as socially permissible
businesses pay the price - but most of and politically possible.The draft law
them try to move it on to the consumer, that I have seen is a copy - almost
which is where the inequity begins. A verbatim - of laws in the European Union
rich consumer will pay the same tax as and is riddled with exemption to various
his poorer counterpart - but the tax will goods, services and sectors.VAT is a good
constitute a smaller part of his income. idea - but it seems to be starting on the
This is the best definition yet found for wrong footing in Macedonia.




www.offshore-net.com keyword stats [2007-02-19-2007-02-19]



Daily top traffic source : MSN
Most current MSN search phrases:

off shore banking interest rates

Other search phrases:

hsbc ofshore ofshore bank accounts
"bank account" limited bankrupt hong kong banks
braina banks carlton banks
off shore banking offshore gaming
chinese banks LLoyds bank mexico
wachovia online banking get a merchant account
OFSHORE SAVINGS ACCOUNTS sea oil rigs
offshore drilling florida merchant account discount rate
offshore crewboat rentals employment on oil rigs north sea
secret bank accounts banking securities
harris banking Offshore boat Company jobs
estate planning trust sun trust merchant accounts
grady white offshore





1 - A - B - C - D - E - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 50 -