Discover an alternative to traditional banking


offshore-net.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

off shore account  

Ifs and VATs of Taxation in Macedonia - Should VAT be Applied in Macedonia?

To be justified, taxes should satisfy a fewconstitute a smaller part of his income. This
conditions:Above all, they should encourageis the best definition yet found for
economic activity by providing incentives toregressivity.On the face of it - and for a
save and to invest. Savings - transformedvery long time - VAT served as a prime
into investments- enhance productivity andexample of regressive, unfair taxation.For a
growth of the economy as a whole.A tax shouldvery long time, that is until the development
be simple - to administer and to comply with.and propagation of the Life Cycle Theories.
It should be "fair" (progressive, inThe main idea in all these theories was that
professional lingo) - although no one seemsconsumption was not based on annual, current
to agree on what this means.At best, itincome only. Rather, it took into
should replace other taxes, whose complianceconsideration future flows of income (income
with the above conditions is less rigorous.expectations). People tended to be constant
In this case it will, usually, lead to budgetin their level of spending (in different
cuts and reduce the overall tax burden.Theperiods in their lives) - even as their
most well known tax is the income tax.annual income vacillated. With the exception
However, it fails to satisfy even one of theof millionaires and billionaires, people
conditions above listed.To start with, it isspent most of their income in their
staggeringly complicated. The IRS code in thelifetime.VAT was, therefore, a just and equal
USA sprawls over more than 8,000 pages andtax. If income equalled consumption in the
500 forms. This single feature makes itlong run, VAT was a form of income tax,
expensive to enforce.Estimates are that 100levied incrementally, with every purchase. It
billion USD are spent annually (by bothreflected a taxpayer's ability to pay (=to
government and taxpayers) to comply with theconsume). It was a wealth tax. As such, it
tax, to administer it and to enforcenecessitated the reduction in other taxes.
it.Income tax is all for consumption andTaxing money spent on consumption was taxing
against savings: it taxes income spent onmoney already taxed once (as income). This
consumption only once - but does so twicewas classic double taxation - a situation
with income earmarked for savings (by taxingwhich had to be remedied.But, in any case,
the interest on it).Income taxes discriminateVAT was a proportional tax when related to a
against business expenses related to thelifetime's income - rather than a regressive
acquisition of capital assets. These cannottax when compared to annual income. Because
be deducted that same fiscal year. Rather,consumption was a parameter more stable than
they have to be depreciated over anincome - VAT made for a more stable and
"accounting life" which is supposed topredictable tax.Still, old convictions die
reflect the useful life of the asset. This ishard. To appease social lobbies everywhere,
not the case with almost all other businesspoliticians came up with solutions which were
expenses (labour, to name the biggest) whichunanimously rejected by economists.The most
are deductible in full the same fiscal yearprevalent was exempting a basket of "poor
expended in.Income taxes encourage debtpeople's goods" from VAT.This gave rise to a
financing over equity financing. After all,series of intricate questions:If food, for
retained earnings are taxed - while interestinstance, was exempted (and it always is) -
expenses are deductible.We can safely saywas this not a subsidy given to rich people
that income taxes in their current form wereas well? Don't rich people eat?Moreover, who
somewhat responsible to an increase inwill decide what is or isn't food? Is caviar
consumer credits and in the national debt (asfood? What about health food? It was
manifested in the budget deficits). They alsoobviously going to be very hard to reach
had a hand in the freefall in the saving ratesocial consensus.If tax on these products
in the USA (from 3.6% in the 80s to 2.1% inwere zeroed - taxes on other products would
the 90s). And money evading the taxhave had to go up to maintain the same
authorities globalised itself using means asrevenue. And so they did. In most countries
diverse as off-shore banking and computerVAT is levied on less than 45% of the GDP -
networking. This made taxing sophisticated,and is reckoned to be twice as high as it
big money close to impossible.No wonder thatshould be.Some sought to correct this
taxes levied on consumption rather than onsituation by subjecting services to VAT but
income came to be regarded as an interestingthis proved onerous and impossible to
alternative.Consumption taxes are levied atimplement in certain sectors of the economy
the Point of Sale (POS). They are a mixed(banking and insurance, to name two).Others
lot:We all get in touch with Excise Taxes.suggested to dedicate VAT generated revenues
These are imposed on products which areto progressivity enhancing programs. But this
considered to be bad both for the consumerwould have entailed the imposition of
and for society. These products bring aboutadditional taxes to cover the shortfall.It is
negative externalities: smoke and lunguniversally thought, that the best method to
cancer, in the case of tobacco, for instance."compensate" the poor for their regressive
So, when tobacco or alcohol are thus taxed -plight is to directly transfer money to them
the idea is to modify and reform ourfrom the budget or to give them vouchers (or
behaviour which is deemed to be damaging totax credits) which they can use to get
society as a whole. About 7% of tax revenuesdiscounts in education, medical treatment,
in the USA come from this source - and doubleetc. These measures will, at least, not
that in other countries.Sales taxes have adistort economic decisions. And we, the less
more modest calling: to raise revenues bylucky taxpayers, will know how much we are
taxing the finished product in the retailpaying for - and to whom.This is one of the
level. Unfortunately, so many authoritiesbudgetary items which increase with the
have the right to impose them - that theyintroduction of VAT. Research shows that
vary greatly from one location to another.there is a strong correlation between the
This adds to the confusion of the taxpayerintroduction of VAT and growth in government
(and of the retailer) and makes the tax morespending. Admittedly, it is difficult to tell
expensive to collect than it should havewhich led to what. Still, certain groups in
been.Moreover, it distorts businessthe population feel that it is their natural
decisions: businesses would tend to locate inright to be compensated for every income
places with lower sales taxes.Sales taxesreducing measure - by virtue of the fact that
have a malignant effect on the pricing ofthey don't have enough of it.But VAT is known
finished goods. First, no tax credit isto have some socially desirable results, as
allowed (sales taxes paid on inputs cannot bewell.To start with, VAT is a renowned fighter
deducted from the sales tax payable by theof the Black Economy. This illegitimate
retailer). Secondly, the tax tends tobranch of economic activity consists of three
cascade, increase the prices of goodselements:The non official sales of legal
(taxable and not, alike), affect investmentsgoods (produced within the tax system)The
in capital goods (which are not exempt). Itsales of illegal goods (which never were
adversely affects exports and domestic goodswithin the tax system)The consumption of
which compete with imports.In short: salesmoney not declared or disclosed to the tax
taxes tend to impede growth and prevent theauthorities VAT lays its heavy paws on all
optimization of economic resources. Comparethree activities.VAT is self enforced. As we
this with the VAT (Value Added Taxes):said, VAT offers a powerful (money) incentive
simple, cheap to collect, contain no implicitnot to collaborate in tax scams. Every tax
taxes on inputs. VAT renders the pricingreceipt means money begotten from the tax
structure of goods transparent. Thisauthorities.VAT is incremental. To completely
transparency encourages economicevade paying VAT on a product would require
efficiency.VAT is used in 80 countriesthe collaboration of dozens of businesses,
worldwide and in 22 out of 24 OECD countries,suppliers and manufacturers. It is much more
with the exception of the federal ones: theplausible to cheat the income tax
USA and Australia.There are three types ofauthorities. VAT is levied on each and every
VAT. They are very different from each otherphase of the production cycle - it is
and the only thing common to them all is thepossible to avoid it in some of these phases,
tax base: the value added by thebut never in all of them. VAT is an
taxpayer.Economic theory defines Value Addedall-pervasive tax.VAT is levied on
as the sum of all the wages, interest paid onconsumption. It is indifferent to the source
capital, rents paid on property and profits.of the money used to pay for it. Thus, it is
In the Addition VAT method, these fouras easily applied to "black", undeclared,
components are taxed directly. The State ofmoney - as it is to completely legal
Michigan in the USA uses this method sincefunds.Surely, there are incentives to avoid
1976. Experience shows that this methodand to evade it. If the amount of inputs in a
yields more predictable tax revenues and isproduct is very low, the VAT on the sale will
less susceptible to business or industrybe very burdensome. A business non-registered
cycles.The Subtraction method, employed inwith the VAT authorities will have a sizeable
Japan and a few much smaller countries, isprice advantage over his registered
admittedly the simplest. It taxes thecompetitor.With a differential VAT system, it
difference between a taxpayer's sales and itsis easy to declare the false sale of
taxed inputs. However, it becomes veryzero-rated goods or services to linked
complicated when the country has a few VATentities or to falsify the inputs, or both.
rates, because the inputs have to beEven computers (which compare the ratio of
separated according to the varioussales to inputs) cannot detect anything
rates.Thus, the most widely accepted systemsuspicious in such a scheme.Yet, these are
is the Credit Invoice. Businesses becomerare occurrences, easily detectable by cross
unpaid tax collectors. They are responsibleexamining information derived from several
to get tax receipts from their suppliersdatabases. All in all, VAT is the ultimate,
(inputs). They will be credited with the VATinevitable tax.Moreover, it is virtuous. By
amounts on the receipts that they havemaking consumption more expensive, it would
collected, so they have a major incentive totend to divert capital into investments and
do so. They will periodically pay the taxsavings. At least, this is what our intuition
authorities the difference between the VAT ontells us.Research begs to differ. It
their sales and the VAT on their inputs, asdemonstrates the resilience of consumers, who
evidenced by the receipts that they havemaintain their consumption levels in the face
collected. If the difference is negative -of mounting price pressures. They even reduce
they will receive a rebate (in certainsavings to do so. We say that their
countries, directly to their bankconsumption is rigid, inelastic. Also, people
account).This is a breathtakingly simpledo not save because it "pays better" to save
concept of tax collection, which alsothan to consume. They don't save because the
distributes the costs of administering therelative return on savings is higher on
tax amongst millions of businesses. In thesavings than on consumption. They save
fiscal year (FY) 1977/8 in the UK - the taxbecause they are goal oriented. They want to
productivity (cost per 1 dollar collected)buy something: a car, a house, higher
was 2%. This means that the government paid 2education for their children.When the yield
cents to collect 1 dollar. But businessesincreases - they will need to save less money
paid the remaining 10 cents.If introduced into get to the same target in the prescribed
the USA, VAT will cost only 3 billion USDperiod of time. We could say that, to some
(with 30,000 tax officials employed in aextent, savings display negative
separate administration). To collect 1 dollarelasticity.Markets balance themselves through
of income tax costs 0.56% in the USA. But, toa series of intricate feedback loops and
collect VAT in Norway costs 0.32%, in Belgium"true models" of economic activity. Take an
- 1.09% and, on average, 0.68%. In short, VATincrease in savings generated by the
does not cost much more than income taxes tointroduction of VAT: it is bound to be short
collect.Yet, what is true for government islived. Why? because the equilibrium will be
not necessarily so for their subjects.Therestored.Increased savings will increase the
compliance cost for a business in the USA isamount of capital available and reduce the
$49. It is $53-282 in other countries.Smallyields on this capital. A reduction in yield
businesses suffer disproportionately morewould, in turn, reduce the savings
than their bigger brethren. It cost themrate.Moreover, narrow (differentiated,
1.94% of VAT revenue in FY 1986/7 in the UK.non-ideal) based VATs lead to higher rates of
Rather more than big firmsVAT (to generate the same revenue). This
(0.003%!).Compliance costs are 40 timesreduces the incentives to work and the amount
higher for small businesses, on average. Thisof income available for savings.In a very
figure masks a larger difference in retailthorough research, Ken Militzer found no
and basic industries (80 times more), inconnection between the introduction of VAT
wholesale (60 times more) and inand an increase in the rate of saving in 22
manufacturing and utilities (45 timesOECD countries since 1965 (VAT was first
more).It was inevitable to think aboutintroduced in France in 1954). He also found
exempting small business from paying VAT.Ifno connection between VAT and changes in
16 out of 24 million businesses were exemptedcorporate (profit) and income taxes.In Europe
- the costs of collecting VAT will go down byVAT replaced various turnover taxes so its
33% - while the revenues will decline by onlyimpact on anything was fairly insignificant.
3%. KPMG claims that businesses with lessIt had no influence on inflation, as well.
than $50,000 annual turnover (18 out of 24VAT apparently has two conflicting
million) exempted in the USA, revenues wouldinfluences: it raises the general price level
have declined by 1.5%. About 70% of the taxthrough a one time "price shock", on one
are paid by 10% of the businesses in the UK.hand. On the other hand, it contracts the
For 69% of the businesses there (witheconomy by providing a disincentive to
turnover of less than 100,000 USD annually)consume. If VAT does influence inflation -
the costs of collection exceed 60% of theits impact will be echoed and amplified
revenues. For 96% of the businesses (withthrough wage indexation and the linking of
less than 1 million USD a year) - the coststransfer payments to the Consumer Price Index
exceed 50%. Only in the case of 30,000(CPI). In this case, maybe its effects should
companies - are the costs less than 20%.be sterilized from the calculations of the
These figures do not include compliance costsCPI.But research was able to demonstrate only
(=costs borne by businesses which comply withthe potentially dangerous contracting,
the tax law).No wonder that small businessesdeflationary (stagflationary, to be exact)
borrow money to pay that VAT bills. Many ofinfluences of this tax. The recommendation is
them - though exempt - register voluntarily,surprising: the Central Bank is advised to
to get an endless stream of rebates. This isincrease the money supply to accommodate the
a major handicap for the tax system andreverberations of the introduction of this
reduces its productivity considerably. In atax.Finally, VAT is a "border adjustment" tax
desperate effort to cope with this(under the GATT and WTO charters).This means
law-abiding flood, tax authorities havethat VAT is rebated to the exporter and
resorted to longer periods of reportingimposed on the importer.Prima facie, this
(instead of monthly). Some of them (in theshould encourage exports - and equally
UK, for one) allow annual VAT reports.Part ofdiscourage imports.Surprisingly, this time
the problem is political. There is littlethe intuition is right - albeit for a limited
disagreement between economists that VAT is aperiod of time.Despite a raging debate in
tax preferable to income taxes. But thiseconomic literature, it seems safe to say the
statement comes with caveats: the tax mustfollowing:VAT increases the profits of
have one rate, universally applied, withoutexporters and producers of import
sector exemptions. This is the ideal VAT.Thesubstitutes.VAT increases the investments in
world being less than ideal - and populatedthe trade sector.VAT increases exports and
by politicians - VATs do not come this way.decreases imports.These advantages are,
They contain many rates and exemptions forultimately, partially offset by the movement
categories of goods and services.Thisof exchange rates.If certain sectors are not
mutilated version is called thetaxed - investment will flow to that sector
differentiated VAT.An ideal VAT isand badly affect the trade sector and the
economically neutral - though not equitable.competitiveness of the country in world
This means that the tax does not affectmarkets.With its burgeoning black market,
economic decisions in ways that it shouldn't.under-developed export industries, huge
On the other hand, its burden is not equallyshortfall in tax revenues - Macedonia
distributed between the haves and haveurgently needs VAT.It will do well to learn
nots.VAT taxes value added in each stage offrom the experience of others and introduce a
the production process. It does so by levyingVAT which is as ideal as socially permissible
a tax on goods and services - but what isand politically possible.The draft law that I
really taxed are the means of production,have seen is a copy - almost verbatim - of
labour and capital. Ultimately, shareholderslaws in the European Union and is riddled
of the taxpaying businesses pay the price -with exemption to various goods, services and
but most of them try to move it on to thesectors.VAT is a good idea - but it seems to
consumer, which is where the inequity begins.be starting on the wrong footing in
A rich consumer will pay the same tax as hisMacedonia.
poorer counterpart - but the tax will



1 A B C D E F 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125